Research by Professor Somerville and a colleague revealed that after British Columbia imposed its tax, prices fell by just 3 to 5 percent in Vancouver neighborhoods that were popular with foreign buyers compared with neighborhoods such buyers avoided.
In a paper published in 2020, Joshua C. Gordon, an adjunct professor in the School of Public Policy at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, British Columbia, found that demand from people outside of Canada has indeed made housing less affordable in Vancouver and Toronto, but not in a way the budget’s sales ban will address.
Many real estate purchases in those cities, he wrote, are made by residents or citizens of Canada acting on behalf of relatives or other people living overseas, who provide the money behind the deals. Whatever form the new ban takes, it will not block such transactions.
“What matters is not so much citizenship but rather the source of funds for real estate purchases,” Mr. Gordon wrote.
Details are scarce about how the federal ban will work. The Department of Finance told me that they “will be available in the coming months.” The budget says that recreational properties will be exempt, although it does not define them; it also exempts people in Canada on student visas that lead to permanent residency, and people temporarily living here for work.
But given that real estate is a provincial responsibility, it’s unclear exactly how the federal government can regulate such sales. Gilles LeVasseur, who teaches constitutional law at the University of Ottawa, said that the regulations will most likely be created as part of the fed’s powers to create criminal law.
But regardless of the means, he said, the rule will run afoul of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms by discriminating against people on the basis of nationality. While rights are not absolute, Professor LeVasseur said that it may be difficult for the government to justify such discrimination in court.